Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case law, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by regulation." It truly is nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Stacy, a tenant in a very duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he experienced not provided her adequate notice before raising her rent, citing a whole new state regulation that requires a minimum of 90 days’ notice. Martin argues that the new law applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.
This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based within the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above facts and circumstances from the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 from the Constitution. Read more
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), clearly distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion consists of a move to the higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, to the other hand, supplies financial relief by placing an employee in the higher pay back scale, without changing their work duties or position. It is a mechanism designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained inside the same fork out scale for a protracted time, particularly when they lack options for promotion. Upgradation is a policy Resource used to ease the hardship of long-term stagnation. Read more
Generally speaking, higher courts never have direct oversight over the lower courts of record, in that they cannot get to out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments in the reduced courts.
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in aid from the Supreme Court, making certain the enforcement of its judgments. Given that the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is reached, the decision with the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) in the Constitution. Read more
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is really a free and cases of administrative law democratic country, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents of your boy or girl never approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they can do if they're able to Reduce off social relations with the son or the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this kind of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that's a major, the couple is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who presents these kinds of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against these kinds of persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by regulation.
On June 16, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf in the boy by a guardian advertisement litem, against DCFS, the social worker, as well as therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf on the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advertisement litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for the dismissal based on absolute immunity, since they were all acting in their jobs with DCFS.
12. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons owning their character previously mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are to become inducted. Verification of character and antecedents can be a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to your Government service will be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to carry out away with the candidature of your petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
12 . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair to your offender and the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar difficulty. When they sue their landlord, the court must utilize the previous court’s decision in applying the regulation. This example of case legislation refers to two cases heard in the state court, on the same level.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case regulation previously rendered on similar cases.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are certainly not binding, but might be used as persuasive authority, which is to offer substance to your party’s argument, or to guide the present court.